if you are looking for questions 6 to 8 :ANSWER PART 2 LINK
1. Assume that you are Weiss. How many viable alternatives do you have to consider regarding the initial shipment of 25 buses?
There
will be two viable alternatives that are left for us. Firstly, Bremerhaven was
not in service in the desired timeframe which means that Bremerhaven is not an
option for Weiss. At this time, Weiss left two choices which are Hamburg and Rotterdam. The ports at Hamburg are available on October 24, October 27,
October 31, and November 2. Besides that, the ports at Rotterdam are available
on October 23, October 28, and November 2. After eliminating the departing date
on November and October 31, Hamburg is only available on October 24, October
27, Rotterdam is October 23 and October 28. However, there is always
possible happen something that may delay the transit time, so that when
choosing the departing date, it must always leave some space for the transit
time as a buffer which is mean that the earlier the better. The deadline for 25
buses is on November 15 and the least needed transit time was 18 days. It means
that the departing date of October 27 and October 28 is more risk if there
happens anything causing a delay in transit. To conclude, the alternative for
Weiss has left Hamburg on October 24 which left 21 days, Rotterdam on October
23 which left 22 days until the deadline.
2. Which of the routing alternatives would you recommend to meet the initial 90-day deadline for the25-bus shipment? Train or waterway? To which port(s)? What would it cost?
Assuming
the railway is used for transport, there are two possible routings which are
Prague to Hamburg with 490 kilometers, and Prague to Rotterdam with 640
kilometers. N.A.M will need 3 days to get the buses from Prague to Hamburg, and
it needs 4 or 5 days to get buses from Prague to Rotterdam. If using the
waterways to reach the Hamburg port from Prague will delay the transit time by
three days more. However, the waterways of Rotterdam to Santos are cheaper as
the ocean shipping charges are 5 percent less and shorten transit time by one
day to reach Santos. After comparing, the Hamburg route will be saved one day
transit time compare with the Rotterdam route. So, it was suggesting using the
railway from Prague to Hamburg in 3 days and using waterways from Hamburg to
Santos is the faster route even the cost is higher than using the Rotterdam
route.
3. What additional information would be helpful for answering Question 2?
Based
on the information have in the case study, there is still a lot of helpful
information that may support answering question 2. For example, real-time
traffic information will be needed to analyze the delay possibility for the
route to reach the destination in the most efficient road. Other than that, the
information on the port performance is also needed to answer question 2. For
example, if the port that choosing is now cargo congestion, then the cargo
might be delayed for shipment or loading and affect the transit time. Moreover,
if the information of port performance is provided, it will be easier to know
how much possibility that the port from Prague to the Rotterdam need 4 or 5
days to get the buses.
4. How important, in fact, are the transport costs for the initial shipment of 25 buses?
Logistic
is always an important element in a business that affects the price of the
product. The transit cost per bus from the Hamburg route is about € 6000, then
25 buses will be €150,000, this was a huge amount. If the first 25 buses did
not handle properly, it may possibly affect the subsequent orders and funds
operations or organization. The first 25 buses will be a trial of the organization
to analyze the organization's capacity to handle the bigger order. For example,
can the organization produce enough products to fulfill the market in the time,
can the company bring profits and avoid loss while processing huge orders.
5. What kinds of customer service support must be provided for this initial shipment of 25 buses? Who is responsible?
In
the initial shipment, there will always be various of constituencies is involve
inside. For example, railway transport, ocean carrier, dock worker, and so on.
However, there are some particular authorities who take responsibility to serve
the customer as customer services are important for logistics. The most
important element that customers need is transparency. For example, a real-time
shipment tracking system can be provided to the customer to enable the customer
to know how the situation of the goods is now, where the goods reach, how many
days to reach. Even more, the tracking system can decrease the workload of the
operator as a customer can found what does the problem occurs and cause a delay
in their goods and don’t need to call the company. This method can
maintain communication with the customer and faster than traditional email or
fax. Other than that, the company can provide an additional insurance procedure
for the goods that the customer order to form a customer sense of trust in the
company. In the end, when the goods have reached the hand of the customer, it
can also ask the customer to provide their feedback to the company to collect
the data for the company to analyses and improve the services to meet the
customer requirement.
0 comments: